Sprache
Typ
- Buch (6)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (2)
- Interview (0)
- Video (0)
- Audio (0)
- Veranstaltung (0)
- Autoreninfo (0)
Zugang
Format
Kategorien
Zeitlich
Geographisch
User account
Article
Facebook's Open Graph Protocol: a medial promise
Irina Kaldrack, Theo Röhle
Creating Subsets of the Masses
Anthology
Social Media—New Masses
Inge Baxmann (ed.), Timon Beyes (ed.), Claus Pias (ed.)
Social Media—New Masses
DIAPHANES Magazine No. 11
Eric Baudelaire
A for Anomie
A for Anomie
The idea that terrorism and other forms of political violence are directly related to strains caused by strongly held grievances has been one of the most common explanations to date and can be traced to a diverse set of theoretical concepts including relative deprivation, social disorganization, breakdown, tension, and anomie. Merton (1938) identifies anomie as a cultural condition of frustration, in which values regarding goals and how to achieve them conflict with limitations on the means of achievement.
Gary LaFree and Laura Dugan, “Research on Terrorism and Countering Terrorism”, Crime and Justice, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2009.
B for Block or Blocked
If terrorism in each of its expressions can be considered an indicator of the existence of a political block (of an impossibility of reacting if one wishes to react differently), this influences its real ability to modify the situation. Terrorism has been historically more successful when it was not...
ACCESS
Antonin Artaud, Stephen Barber (ed.)
Radio Works: 1946–48
Dieter Mersch
Digital Criticism
ACCESS DE
A.K. Kaiza
An Annotated History of Wakanda
ACCESS DE
Marcus Quent
Belief in the world is what we most lack.
It was Gilles Deleuze who in various contexts underlined that what we most lacked was “belief in the world.” The odd remark appears, for example, in a conversation in 1990 with the Italian Marxist Antonio Negri about revolutionary emergence and the political force of minorities. In this dialogue Negri examines his interlocutor’s thought in the light of the “problem of the political,” which connects the various stages of the philosopher’s intellectual biography. Deleuze’s remark here is the reprise of a motif that would be familiar to readers of his second book on cinema, which appeared in 1985, in which Deleuze contends that the “power of modern cinema” is based on its ability to “give us back” our lost “belief in the world.”
At the end of the conversation Negri asks his dialogue partner about the possibility of present-day processes of subjectivization. After initially emphasizing the “rebellious spontaneity” of such processes, Deleuze...
ACCESS DE